<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you write?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/09/13/what-do-you-write/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/09/13/what-do-you-write/</link>
	<description>musings on technical communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:40:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: w0</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/09/13/what-do-you-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6036</link>
		<dc:creator>w0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/?p=193#comment-6036</guid>
		<description>Sure - my documents are fairly homogeneous. I have 3 - 4 sources of information, 1 audience, 1 output format. Large differences in process occur when I&#039;m acting as either project manager vs writer vs editor, but they are very different tasks.

Hey! check this out, I distilled my process (as a semi-autonomous TW) into a GIF file.  I don&#039;t claim that the following diagram is the paradigm of tech writing, but it works for me.

http://picasaweb.google.com/tw314pi/Semicolon?authkey=9qflgEBdnwQ#5247401428013867810

Notes:
1) &quot;wrt:whole product&quot; is when I consider where the piece I&#039;m working on fits into the larger product I am responsible for.

2) &quot;procedures&quot; under &quot;Write:&quot;, in DITA should be tasks, heh but that&#039;s just semantics.

Is this what you were curious about? Does this tie into your message and my response to this post: http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/07/22/consideration-layer-model/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure &#8211; my documents are fairly homogeneous. I have 3 &#8211; 4 sources of information, 1 audience, 1 output format. Large differences in process occur when I&#8217;m acting as either project manager vs writer vs editor, but they are very different tasks.</p>
<p>Hey! check this out, I distilled my process (as a semi-autonomous TW) into a GIF file.  I don&#8217;t claim that the following diagram is the paradigm of tech writing, but it works for me.</p>
<p><a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/tw314pi/Semicolon?authkey=9qflgEBdnwQ#5247401428013867810" rel="nofollow">http://picasaweb.google.com/tw314pi/Semicolon?authkey=9qflgEBdnwQ#5247401428013867810</a></p>
<p>Notes:<br />
1) &#8220;wrt:whole product&#8221; is when I consider where the piece I&#8217;m working on fits into the larger product I am responsible for.</p>
<p>2) &#8220;procedures&#8221; under &#8220;Write:&#8221;, in DITA should be tasks, heh but that&#8217;s just semantics.</p>
<p>Is this what you were curious about? Does this tie into your message and my response to this post: <a href="http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/07/22/consideration-layer-model/" rel="nofollow">http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/07/22/consideration-layer-model/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon McLean</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/09/13/what-do-you-write/comment-page-1/#comment-5993</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon McLean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/?p=193#comment-5993</guid>
		<description>w0 - thanks for chipping in. Interesting to hear that you&#039;ve done little &quot;non-print&quot; work, which is the complete opposite from me. 

Do you find you can take processes and working practices across from one type of document to another?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>w0 &#8211; thanks for chipping in. Interesting to hear that you&#8217;ve done little &#8220;non-print&#8221; work, which is the complete opposite from me. </p>
<p>Do you find you can take processes and working practices across from one type of document to another?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w0</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/09/13/what-do-you-write/comment-page-1/#comment-5992</link>
		<dc:creator>w0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/?p=193#comment-5992</guid>
		<description>- Conceptual and Procedural L3-L5 Networking Documentation (maybe a little L2)
- Procedural OS System Documentation 
- Procedural Hardware Documentation
- Network/LAN Application Analysis
- Non-technical User Documentation (actually &quot;dumb user&quot;) GUI based documentation.

The funny thing is that in all my years of tech writing, I&#039;ve done barely any non-print documentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Conceptual and Procedural L3-L5 Networking Documentation (maybe a little L2)<br />
- Procedural OS System Documentation<br />
- Procedural Hardware Documentation<br />
- Network/LAN Application Analysis<br />
- Non-technical User Documentation (actually &#8220;dumb user&#8221;) GUI based documentation.</p>
<p>The funny thing is that in all my years of tech writing, I&#8217;ve done barely any non-print documentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

