<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why technical reviews fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/08/13/why-technical-reviews-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/08/13/why-technical-reviews-fail/</link>
	<description>musings on technical communications</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Weekly links roundup&#160;by&#160;Communications from DMN</title>
		<link>http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/2008/08/13/why-technical-reviews-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-4854</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Weekly links roundup&#160;by&#160;Communications from DMN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemanwrites.co.uk/?p=169#comment-4854</guid>
		<description>[...] Gordon McLean analyzes at why technical reviews fail. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gordon McLean analyzes at why technical reviews fail. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
